What it means (plain English)
When you evaluate a PMS scheme, you’re trying to answer three questions:how much it returns,how much risk it takes, andhow predictable the journey is. Downside Protection In Crashes helps you quantify one part of that story.
Why it matters for PMS scheme selection
See the complete PMS evaluation framework
- Improves fairness in comparisons by adding context to headline returns.
- Helps identify trade-offs (return vs risk, upside capture vs downside protection, consistency vs bursts).
- Reduces the risk of “chasing” the last best period by encouraging multi-metric evaluation.
How to interpret it (practical checklist)
Try the relevant calculator/tool
Common pitfalls (how this gets misused)
Read our methodologyfor assumptions and limitations.
- Judging a scheme based on one metric alone.
- Comparing metrics calculated with different assumptions or data frequencies.
- Ignoring benchmark choice and peer-group context.
- Overweighting short histories or cherry-picked periods.
Related metrics to review together
Use Downside Protection In Crashes alongside these metrics to avoid one-number decision-making:
Related guides
- Expense Ratio In PMS
- Capacity Constraints In PMS
- Liquidity Risk In Small Cap Schemes
- Leverage And Derivatives In PMS
- PMS Sharpe Vs Sortino
FAQs
Downside Protection In Crashes is a concept used to evaluate PMS scheme performance, risk, or portfolio behavior. It helps you compare schemes more fairly than headline returns alone.
Use Downside Protection In Crashes alongside related metrics (drawdowns, volatility, and benchmark-relative measures) and review it across multiple horizons to reduce cherry-picking.
Common mistakes include focusing on one metric in isolation, comparing across different strategies/benchmarks, and relying on short track records.
What is Downside Protection In Crashes in PMS evaluation?
Downside Protection In Crashes is a concept used to evaluate PMS scheme performance, risk, or portfolio behavior. It helps you compare schemes more fairly than headline returns alone.
How should I use Downside Protection In Crashes when comparing schemes?
Use Downside Protection In Crashes alongside related metrics (drawdowns, volatility, and benchmark-relative measures) and review it across multiple horizons to reduce cherry-picking.
What are the common mistakes investors make with Downside Protection In Crashes?
Common mistakes include focusing on one metric in isolation, comparing across different strategies/benchmarks, and relying on short track records.